Evaluate the effectiveness of three different mentoring session structures for a 1-hour session focused on career development.  Structure 1:  A structured agenda with pre-defined topics and allocated time for each. Structure 2: A free-flowing conversation guided by the mentee&#8217;s needs and priorities. Structure 3: A combination of both, starting with a structured agenda but allowing for flexibility based on the mentee&#8217;s input. For each structure, consider the following factors:</p>
<p>* **Engagement:** How engaging and interactive is the session for both mentor and mentee?<br />
* **Actionable Outcomes:** How likely is the session to result in specific, actionable steps for the mentee?<br />
* **Mentee Satisfaction:** How satisfied is the mentee with the structure and outcomes of the session?<br />
* **Time Efficiency:** How effectively does the structure utilize the allotted time?<br />
* **Scalability:** How easily could this structure be adapted for different mentees and mentoring programs?</p>
<p>Provide a comparative analysis of the three structures, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses based on the factors above.  Include specific examples of how each structure might unfold in practice.  Conclude with a recommendation for the most effective structure, justifying your choice based on your analysis.